Download Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan
Yeah, hanging around to review guide Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan by on-line could likewise offer you favorable session. It will reduce to interact in whatever problem. In this manner can be more fascinating to do and also much easier to read. Now, to obtain this Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan, you can download in the web link that we supply. It will help you to obtain very easy way to download guide Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan.
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan
Download Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan. Happy reading! This is exactly what we intend to state to you who like reading a lot. Exactly what regarding you that assert that reading are only commitment? Never ever mind, reviewing routine must be begun with some certain factors. Among them is reading by obligation. As just what we intend to provide below, guide entitled Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan is not kind of required publication. You could enjoy this e-book Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan to check out.
When obtaining this book Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan as reference to read, you could acquire not just motivation but likewise brand-new expertise and driving lessons. It has more compared to common benefits to take. What kind of book that you read it will work for you? So, why ought to get this e-book entitled Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan in this article? As in web link download, you can get the publication Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan by on-line.
When getting the e-book Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan by on-line, you could read them any place you are. Yeah, even you remain in the train, bus, hesitating checklist, or other places, on the internet e-book Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan can be your great friend. Every single time is a great time to check out. It will improve your knowledge, fun, amusing, session, and also experience without investing more money. This is why on-line book Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan ends up being most really wanted.
Be the initial which are reviewing this Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan Based upon some reasons, reading this e-book will offer more benefits. Even you have to review it pointer by step, page by page, you can complete it whenever and wherever you have time. Again, this online publication Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism In The Age Of Globalization, By Reza Aslan will certainly give you easy of checking out time as well as activity. It additionally offers the experience that is affordable to reach and also get significantly for far better life.
The wars in the Middle East have become religious wars in which God is believed to be directly engaged on behalf of one side against the other. The hijackers who attacked America on September 11, 2001, thought they were fighting in the name of God. According to award-winning writer and scholar of religions Reza Aslan, the United States, by infusing the War on Terror with its own religiously polarizing rhetoric, is fighting a similar war—a war that can’t be won.
Beyond Fundamentalism is both an in-depth study of the ideology fueling al-Qa‘ida, the Taliban, and like-minded militants throughout the Muslim world and an exploration of religious violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. At a time when religion and politics increasingly share the same vocabulary and function in the same sphere, Aslan writes that we must strip the conflicts of our world of their religious connotations and address the earthly grievances that always lie at its root.
How do you win a religious war? By refusing to fight in one.
Featuring new content and updated analysis
Originally published as How to Win a Cosmic War
- Sales Rank: #57274 in Books
- Brand: Brand: Random House Trade Paperbacks
- Published on: 2010-04-06
- Released on: 2010-04-06
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 7.98" h x .63" w x 5.13" l, .43 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 240 pages
- Used Book in Good Condition
From School Library Journal
This book offers an informed critique of good-and-evil dualisms on both sides in the war on terror. Terrorists and their opponents share an "us against them" conception of reality that vilifies the enemy as irredeemable and suited only for destruction. Political estrangement and isolation nurture the cosmic dualism inherent in violent jihadist ideologies, argues Aslan (creative writing, Univ. of California at Riverside; No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam). But a similar dualism lies behind ill-founded American responses to terrorism. In quick, informative surveys, Aslan takes readers through the origins of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, zealotry in ancient Jewish and contemporary (evangelical Christian and Zionist) forms, the history of Islamic jihadist distortions of Islamic teaching, and the repressive postcolonial governments that nurture such radical ideologs. But Aslan is hopeful: radical groups moderate their ideologies when they are drawn into the political process, and a new U.S. administration may adopt a more enlightened foreign policy. Aslan's suggestions are simple but not simplistic. Recommended for all readers interested in viewing the war on terror from this alternative perspective.—Steve Young, McHenry Cty. Coll., Crystal Lake, IL
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From The New Yorker
Aslan’s thoughtful analysis of America’s war on terror argues that the nation’s jihadist enemies believe the conflict is taking place on a spiritual, “cosmic” plane and thus cannot be lost. Only by denying the terrorists their good-versus-evil religious narrative can the United States keep the war grounded and winnable. Certainly this is good advice, although, given President Obama’s abandonment of his predecessor’s Manichaean foreign policy, it may have been overtaken by recent events. Far more interesting is Aslan’s agreement with Bush on the question of democracy. He distinguishes Islamist nationalist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah from global jihadist groups such as Al Qaeda, and contends that recognizing the former as legitimate participants in the democratic process will undermine support for unyielding war. It’s an appealing, if unproved, claim.
Copyright ©2008 Click here to subscribe to The New Yorker
Review
“[A] thoughtful analysis of America’s War on Terror.”
—The New Yorker
“Offers a very persuasive argument for the best way to counter jihadism.”
—The Washington Post
“[Reza] Aslan dissects a complex subject (terrorism and globalization) and distills it with a mix of narrative writing, personal anecdotes, reportage and historical analysis.”
—San Francisco Chronicle
“Aslan is not only a perspicuous, thoughtful interpreter of the Muslim world but also a subtle psychologist of the call to jihad.”
—Los Angeles Times
“[A] meaty analysis of the rise of Jihadism . . . dispels common misconceptions of the War on Terror age.”
—San Jose Mercury News
“It is Aslan’s great gift to see things clearly, and to say them clearly, and in this important new work he offers us a way forward. He is prescriptive and passionate, and his book will make you think.”
—Jon Meacham, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of American Lion
Most helpful customer reviews
90 of 98 people found the following review helpful.
Bringing the Cosmic War Back to Earth
By Timothy Haugh
With his second book, How to Win a Cosmic War, Reza Aslan has solidified his place as the voice of moderation in the battles of Christian vs. Islam. As an American-born Muslim, he has insights for his fellow citizens about the history and perspective of those whose hearts and minds we are trying to win in the Middle East.
Unlike his previous book, No god but God, which was more of a history lesson in Islam for those of us in the West, this book focuses more specifically on the issues of fundamentalism and terrorism with which we are dealing today. He describes the growth of radical groups throughout the twentieth century. He shows how the idea of jihad was perverted by certain Muslims and what that means for us today.
Ultimately, he is trying to convince us to take what is too often articulated as a "cosmic war" (often unthinkingly) and bring it back down to earth. The terrorists we battle are dangerous because they don't have attainable, negotiable goals. The overthrow of the West, worldwide Islamic rule--these are not likely to happen and are certainly not things we can negotiate. This rhetoric elevates their struggle to the cosmic plane. The image becomes one of Good vs. Evil, God vs. Satan. Yet, when we allow ourselves to echo this rhetoric and inflame tensions by using words like "crusade," we are fighting a cosmic battle, not a real one. Cosmic battles cannot be won. Mr. Aslan reminds us that only by focusing on real, attainable goals can we make progress and reduce terrorism. By changing the "real world" around the terrorists for the better, they cannot recruit. There will always be radicals, but they are criminals, not warriors, however they see themselves.
Mr. Aslan has a rare point-of-view. Perhaps it arises from the mistrust he often feels all around--some Americans don't trust him because he is a Muslim of Middle Eastern decent and Middle Easterners don't trust him because he's American. But this perspective gives him an amazingly reasonable view of our world and he is often right on target. He has a tendency to be over-generous in his judgments sometimes--he is optimistic about everyone--but he is fair. That is a point-of-view we can use more of in our world.
32 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
Read this book instead of five others
By Muhammad A. Syed
Reza Aslan has done remarkably well in explaining the philosophy that drives Islamist terrorism. How collective guilt is assigned and collective punishment is justified. How the apparent injustice of killing innocent civilians and innocent children is explained away.
These ideas have been touched on by others as well (like Fawaz Gerges), but Aslans book connects the dots between different ideas and puts them together to make sense.
The war on terror cannot be won by bombs. This is an ideological war. It requires a different approach.
78 of 90 people found the following review helpful.
Cosmic War
By Margaret Magnus
So unlike what most of the detractors here claim, this book is not an apology for terrorism. Its essential point, as the the title suggests, is that if we accept the battle as defined by the Jihadists -- as a cosmic war-- then it is unwinnable, and pursuing it on those terms will inevitably distance us from the Muslim world.
My sense is that Aslan's most fundamental allegiance is to the Muslim world, which he would like to see become democratic, but that he genuinely believes in the American dream as well and wants to be one with it. He is doing his best to make a positive contribution toward a better world by describing the world through his eyes, and he is not stupid. His description of the young jihadist mindset as acting out of misguided love rather than hate - was subtle, accurate and brave, and a real contribution to the discussion. He does a good job of explaining the difference between Jihadists vs. Islamists, and why we fail to understand the dynamic between them at our peril. I think he describes the wound so effectively, because he is wounded himself, and that in itself doesn't diminish the book.
But in failing to overcome the wound, he fails to convince the unconvinced. In what follows, I overemphasize the negative. The book is mostly fair, and he has a point, but I'm trying to explain what will set people off. He is upset that Western countries don't have more toleration for Muslim cultures, despite the fact that the degree of toleration they do display would be unthinkable in many Muslim majority countries. Consider:
"Even in Europe and the developed world, the idea of secular nationalism was problematic. That is because membership, or rather citizenship, in the nation-state requires submission to the state's sovereignty over all aspects of life. Max Weber's axiom that the state is the entity that claims monopoly on the legitimate use of force has proven a woefully inadequate description of the nearly absolute powers claimed by even the freest and most liberal nation-state. The modern state holds a monopoly not only on force, but also on identity. It assumes meticulous control over every aspect of social life, both private and public. It is the primary repressive force for controlling human impulses. It declares what is and what is not proper religious or political expression. It demands consent over all activity - social, sexual and spiritual. Above all, it decides who can and cannot share in the collective identity it has itself demarcated. The state's sovereignty over life and death is absolute and unavoidable." (p.21)
This paragraph does not represent my experience of life in America, (though despite adding `and the developed world', I realized later that he was really talking primarily about Europe). At our founding, a great deal of thought was put into the rights of subcultures and the separation of powers. Subcultures whose laws do not conflict with the Constitution, like the Orthodox Jews and the Amish, have maintained their way of life within our borders for hundreds of years. Later in the book, I realized he was talking about the mindset of the European Generation E from whom the Jihadists spring. But it could also be an argument for tolerating subcultures whose laws are inconsistent with the Constitution of the land, and whose members are subjected to those alternative laws against their will. The case of Muslim women who want to live Western lives and who cannot break out has proven to be a problem in Europe. The European court must have jurisdiction in those cases or society collapses.
Other examples:
* He says that the Islamists and Jihadists who gathered to repulse the Soviets in Afghanistan were a diverse lot, and in other contexts emphasizes (correctly) the diversity in the Muslim world. But why aren't there 30 diverse Chinese or Christian or European extremist groups who can be recruited into a program of mudering everyone who isn't Chinese or Christian or European?
* He talks about European Islamophobia -- how it's time they got over it considering regions in Holland are nearly half Muslim. Why does he not in this context address the fact that the immigration goes all one way? Would the inverse situation in Esfahan be handled more equitably? He attributes it offhandedly several pages later to de-colonization, but that doesn't explain the explosion of Muslim populations in the Germanic countries - certainly not Scandinavia. I feel that if he is to convince Europe, he needs to address more effectively both Muslim culpability for their own situation and the the emotion a Frenchman has for la République.
* In his discussion of American Christianity, he describes evangelical Christians as extremists on a par with Jihadists, and then says that evangelicals make up about 50% of the American population, which may be true, because mainstream Methodists and Congregationalists are (I believe) evangelicals. The mainstream American Christian is left after this section feeling, "Wait a minute."
* He sometime indulges in name-calling. Oriana Fallaci is a pseudo-liberal. Geert Wilders is worse. I think Fallaci is at least as articulate and incisive as he is, though quite a bit more prone to pull punches. Rather than insulting her back, I'd like to see him address her point by point in a fair-minded way.
* Early in the book, he offhandedly dismisses the notion that these bands of transnational terrorist riff-raff have any real military power. Later on, he correlates them with the Zealots of the first Century who were easily crushed by the Romans. What bothers me about this analogy is that the hydrogen bomb had not been invented yet in 70 AD. I kept waiting in vain for him to mention the word `atom'. Some reasonable people like his beloved Obama appear to be far more concerned than he about big bombs in the hands of riff-raff. He's not sensible enough to the fact that Hitler was democractically elected riff-raff, and that that figures into Western calculations.
Anyway after all that whining, I want to conclude by recommending the book, especially if you have a different view, because I think he's a good and intelligent man, and I think you'll learn something worth learning.
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan PDF
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan EPub
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan Doc
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan iBooks
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan rtf
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan Mobipocket
Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization, by Reza Aslan Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar